Art therapy is not just for
children but can be applied to adults with brain injury or impairment.
However in this paper I would like to discuss the analysis of art
produced by children who are troubled with psychological problems
stemming from family discord. Dysfunctional families are now more common
than abusive ones. Abusive families tend to get the media attention but
dysfunctional is harder to quantify for the media and so mainly
ignored. When treating children, art therapy can give insights were
direct communication is almost impossible. Many child therapists however
cannot analyze children's art from a scientific point of view and so
this paper is to give some basic directions to those interested in the
mind of a child through art.
Introduction
For
art therapy to be understood the therapist or teacher needs to have
some basic insight into child psychology from past experimental work
that gave direction to our modern thought. The first would be Vygotsky's
position of child cognitive development. The first being his stated
position on language development. That a child has limited reasoning
during the early years as it does not have the language skills to
express complex logic. The second is scaffolding, that a child given the
basics of an idea or concept can build upon it without further direct
instruction through trial and error learning over time. What both these
insights tell us is that a young child cannot communicate complex
emotional feelings clearly until nearing their teenage developmental
stages. (1 Vygotsky 1962) Chomsky in the USA later supported Votgotskys
idea when he proposed a language acquisition devise in the brain at
birth. (LAD). Chomsky stated that unlike any other animal on the planet
humans have language that develops faster than can be explained through
everyday learning. That if you take an American baby and give it at
birth to a Japanese couple to raise, it will eventually speak only
Japanese. The language the brain is exposed to at birth is the one it
develops over time. (2 Chomsky 1968)
Later in the 1950's Piaget (3
Piaget 1973) who had know about Votgosky's work used many of his ideas
to develop his own theory of cognitive stages of development in
children. Although he disagreed with Votgoskys stance on language he did
devise many useful experiments to show a staged developmental
cognition. The one part we are interested in from an art therapy point
of view is ego-centrism. Piaget made a paper mache three mountains on a
table. (We would refer to a 3D model today). He asked young children to
look at the mountains and watch figures moving about such as man, woman,
child for example. In front of the child were a series of photographs
showing the mountain model from several angles and views? The child was
asked to watch the figures and then point to the photo from the figures
point of view, where they were placed. Most children under seven always
chose the photo that best displayed not the figures point of view but
there own. In other words the child could only see the world from its
perspective and not other peoples. This was termed ego-centric and
lasted until the child was old enough to de-centre through the
acquisition of empathy. (Note, cultures such as China have a lack of
empathy in their psychology mainly due to a lack of social learning in
the family. So many are still ego-centric well into their 20's.) In the
UK Margaret Donaldson went on the redesign Piaget's original experiment
with the policeman and naughty boy model. This was much more culturally
acceptable to children unfamiliar with mountains as Swiss children would
have been. Donaldson concluded that children in the UK at least,
de-centered earlier. This maybe part of the British character of easy
international adaptation to environment changes. (4 Donaldson 1978)
The
two main child theories above then start our thinking into art analysis
by giving us a basic insight into child communication and development.
Obviously the theories are more complex and deeper than I have explained
here and need to be learned more thoroughly by the therapist. These
ideas are merely pointers to interpretation of the uncommunicative child
though art.
The How To:
Children are wary
of strangers and particularly men. There are two reasons for this, first
strangers in a child's world represent a threat and therefore create an
alarm reaction. In babies this may be crying in older children under
seven this maybe social learning, parents and teachers giving warnings
about talking to strangers in the street. Secondly where children are
brought up by unemotional parents they accept strangers more easily than
those from caring emotional families. It is their nature to seek a
caring bond and attention even if this might be negative such as being
punished. (Skinner 1960 - operant conditioning).
With the above in
mind in order for the child to be happy and willing to draw for the
therapist is can be useful to allow a familiar person to give the
instruction such as the primary school teacher that takes the child
everyday. If the child is from a dysfunctional family the parents are
the last people you need to help. Remember abusive parents often present
children to doctors with complaints from a position of care
(Muchenhousin disease by proxy). Therefore if the child is troubled and
in mental anguish then until you knows otherwise, suspect everyone and
use instructors away from the child's normal carers.
A simple step by step approach to drawing production is the best way.
- Have paper, A3, is best with assortment of drawing materials,
pencils, crayons and any other suitable markers. Have a table and chair
that is comfortable for the child's age - not to high - the floor is OK
for children if suitably dressed.
- The adult who is giving instructions should be face to face beside
the child. This means at the child's height and eye level. Adults should
kneel or sit where there are at the same height level. This takes away
some of the domination structures and allows for a more equal approach
to the child.
- Ask the child to draw their family in front of their home. The
reason this is always a good start as the positioning is very important.
Also how the child perceives their living space.
- Give the child plenty of time; tell them there is no rush to finish.
Most children complete the task in about ten minutes. Some take longer
who want to elaborate their drawing with colour and detail.
- Thank the child and promise to return their drawing to them later,
this is important as the child puts value in their creativity and will
want to show significant others in their life such as other siblings or
parents.
Analysis Approach
Again a step by step approach is the most effective way to start.
- Take an overview. What is the initial impression? Is the child's
drawing compatible with their age? Is it immature, undefined, lack of
care in production etc? Is it well constructed for their age, showing
imagination and the grasp of concepts? (For example does smoke bend out
of a chimney or go straight up. This would indicate the concept of wind
for example.)
- Look at family positioning, does the child put themselves at the
centre of the group (perhaps ego-centric) are they slightly apart? Are
bothers and sisters placed differently, is one parent further apart that
the other. All these can give insight into the family dynamics. Are
they in height order? Are they smiling or frowning? Look at body
proportions - this can indicate power plays. Finally look for any
unusual details in the family that may give rise to questions.
- Look at the periphery, how is the home drawn, is there a path, is it
accurate? Has the child put things in the windows? Are there additional
objects such as a car, bicycle, swing, gate etc.? All these objects may
give rise to insight from later questions.
- Once you have come to your initial conclusions write them down. Then
ask two other non-professional people to look at the drawing and give
you their initial impressions. This can lead to seeing something we
missed or did not consider. Lay people are not hampered by knowledge.
Then re-look at your own initial analysis and decide if you need to
revise it slightly. Do not be too influenced by your lay observers they
may also have internal perspectives that tend to objectify their ability
to see the child's point of reference.
- Take the drawing back to the child and ask simple gentle questions.
Tell the child you are very impressed by their effort. Then ask about
the objects first, what they mean to the child. The car for instance.
This is better as it lets the child de-center from the family to begin
with. Look for the significance the child puts in objects and cultural
learning.
- Ask the child about the family, who is who (even though this may be
obvious) let the child explain. In what order does he talk about the
family members, does he forget someone, what is the positioning in the
picture; ask why someone is further away - or holding hands, etc. Where
is he/she in relation to the parents, siblings etc. This may indicate
relationship problems or highlights.
- Finally, rethink your original notes in line with the child's
self-report. What differed, what was highlighted, what insights did you
discover?
Once the process is over then the work of applying theory
to the analysis gives you the final overview and insight into your
drawing. This should then be presented in a report of three parts. First
a paragraph or two on the child's presenting problems and family
situation. Second, the initial analysis of the artwork from your
findings and impressions. Third your theoretical insight from a
psychological point of reference.
This last part should include
your recommendations for educational support, teacher insight and
therapeutic intervention of required.
Often once a meeting with
the teacher and parents has been convened to discuss the child's
situation then the next steps in support can be agreed upon. Where the
parents are the problem, this then is best left to the psychologist as
an outsider to meet with them as an authoritarian figure to enable open
dialogue.
Experience
It takes time and
quite a few attempts with children of various ages to build up the skill
of art therapy and interpretation. It is not always so obvious what the
child is trying to communicate through their art. Also take into
account the scientific bias of the participants and analysis. It is easy
to project your own ideas of child situations instead of being
objective. As any good therapist knows you leave your own ego at the
door. Children are vulnerable, easily influenced and directed by
skillful manipulators and so abuse goes undetected for many children.
Caution should be advised before taking a child's art impression to a
legal standpoint.
Real example.
A child was
presented at school as disruptive, violent and attention seeking. His
teachers wanted to expel him from the school. He is 8 years old and
often attacks teachers by kicking them from behind.
The child drew
a picture of his standing between his parents holding his hands up
keeping the two apart who are seen shouting at each other. The child in
the drawing is crying and angry.
Life was so difficult at home
having to play the role of parent to his parents that at school he acted
out to compensate for his misery at home. He saw teachers as other
parents and so needed to punish them. He needed attention at school even
if negative in order to fulfill his need for love.
In a meeting
with the mother, she was shocked to see how her son found family life.
It was agreed that future arguments between her husband and herself
should be conducted out of the child's hearing or presence. That a
calmer atmosphere should be strived for over time.
The child
within two weeks had calmed down and started to be more cooperative and
although he relapsed from time to time he was much happier in class and
cooperative.
This example is straight forward and much more detail
came from the drawing than this conclusion, but it gives you the
general idea.
In Summery
Art therapy can be
informative as part of a wider approach to child psychology and in
particularly therapy situations where a child has presenting problems to
tackle. Art allows a child to communicate through visual imagery which
is cognitively more developed under seven years than verbal skills,
reasoning and conceptual thought.
A professional psychologist should always do the analysis and not a
counsellor. The reason is more a question of wider knowledge and
training that most counselors in schools have. It is also important to
be holistic with children and see if other factors such as diet,
bullying or trauma might have an influence on his artistic impressions.
References:
1 Vygotsky 1962 - Gross R D (2004) Psychology the Science of Mind and Behaviour4th Ed. Hodder & Stoughton Pgs 498 - 500
2 Chomsky 1969 - Gross R D (2004) Psychology the Science of Mind and Behaviour4th Ed. Hodder & Stoughton Pgs 284 - 286
3 Piaget 1973 - Gross R D (2004) Psychology the Science of Mind and Behaviour4th Ed. Hodder & Stoughton Pgs 491 - 498
4 Donaldson 1978 - Gross R D (2004) Psychology the Science of Mind and Behaviour4th Ed. Hodder & Stoughton Pgs 496
*Note
that Vygotsky's work was conducted in Russia in 1920's but only
translated into English in the 1960's when it exposed Piaget's secret
influence to his own work.